Grant D Film Studies Blog Fall 2013
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
MYST #6 – Frozen
With the holiday season over, it's that time of the year again where Chicago says, "Oh yeah! Fall was supposed to change a month ago!" and drops on us three months of hardcore winter. What more of an appropriate time stuck in a seemingly perpetual ice wonderland than to watch a movie about getting stuck in a seemingly perpetual ice wonderland! Enter Frozen!
Frozen is the next big Disney musical fantasy movie similar to the likes of those produced during their "Renaissance Era" (eg The Lion King, Aladdin, The Little Mermaid, etc). Loosely based of the old fairy tale The Snow Queen, the story follows two royal sisters Anna and Elsa. Elsa possesses cyrokinetic powers (ability to manipulate cold and ice), and after an incident that injures her Anna at a young age she is forced to keep her powers a secret from everyone including her sister. After years have past, Elsa is of age to become the Queen of the land (Her parents died on a voyage across the seas. Y'know, typical depressing Disney backstories). However, on the night of her coronation, after refusing to give blessing to her sister's fiancee, whom she had literally just met (and thus becoming a running gag), an argument with Anna escalates to the point where her powers are revealed. Panicked, Elsa runs away and inadvertently unleashes an eternal winter across the land. Now, it is up to Anna to try to get Elsa to restore the country with the help of some new friends along the way: Kristoff, a mountain man (SPOILER the actual love interest), with his reindeer buddy Sven; and Olaf, the talking, humorous snowman who dreams of experiencing summer (and also whose main role is to provide an easy marketing strategy for the Disney business conglomerate).
Now, ever since the end of their Renaissance, Disney had relied on Pixar to produce the best animated films for the 2000s. However, after the release of Cars, Pixar's most finically successful yet least critically successful movie at the time, the Walt Disney Animation Studio seemed to step their game up. The movies released in the subsequent years, Bolt and The Princess and the Frog, seem to validate. But something interesting happened. Since 2011, the movie produced by the Walt Disney Animation Studio were more critically acclaimed than those produced by Pixar. This still held true this year with Frozen, and I have no problem with it. Pixar held its dominance for quite a long time throughout the 2000s and made some of the greatest animated movies of all time, but I think everyone knew that their stride wouldn't last forever. With that, however, brought into light a whole new level of creative exposure in the world of animated film, bringing movies like How To Train Your Dragon, Paranorman, Rango, Wreck-It-Ralph, and even Frozen into this new specialty spotlight of being "better than Pixar."
Speaking of which, I really enjoyed Frozen. It was very fun and adorable, the music had that awesome Broadway spectacular feel (the music was half penned by the guy who did the music for The Book of Mormon), and the animation, especially the snowy sequences, looked beautiful. For fans of of animation, or anyone who wants to see a cool movie, it's a must-see.
I give this movie:
9/10 for quality
9/10 for watchability.
I hope you all enjoyed my review of Frozen.
Fond regards,
~Grant Dunderman
January 2014
Film Studies Period 10
MYST #5 – Man On Wire
When was the last time you sat down and watched a documentary that wasn't for a class assignment? (Discover Channel doesn't count) Wow, really? A long time? Well, dust off the ol' Netflix search box and take a break from binge-watching Dexter because the next thing you should be watching is a little doc called Man on Wire.
The movie follows the life of Philippe Petit, a French high-wire artist, and his journey towards his dream of high-wire walking across the World Trade Center in 1974. The film dives deep within the mindset of the tight-rope walking as well as conducting interview with him, his family, his friends, and even his colleagues.
Now, most of the time documentaries tend to follow the same general principles: show the people being interviewed, have their voice projected over images, show archival footage, and, on occasion, have a voice-actor fill in any gaps. This film does this, but in the best way possible. See, the story of how Petit was able to get a high-wire up on top of the World Trade Center had a very espionage and thriller vibe to it, so the logically thing to do was to presented it like so. Now, this would seem like a very difficult process to do in a documentary, but the filmmakers were able to grasp it with such skill that it was more engaging and thrilling than the last James Bond movies. They made the people interviewed the storytellers (unlike just being there for personal aesthetics), and with the use of fine editing, impressive archival footage, and the occasional dramatic reconstruction scenes (which, by the way, were the most realistic I've seen in any documentary), the story of Philippe Petit made this movie one of the best movies I've seen all year.
I give this movie:
10/10 for quality.
9/10 for watchability.
I hope you all enjoyed my review of Man On Wire.
Fond regards,
~Grant Dunderman
January 2014
Film Studies Period 10
Monday, December 9, 2013
Formal Film Study: Kvikmyndir frá Íslandi (Movies from Iceland)
Fljótur! Nefndu þrjú atriði frá Íslandi! Ef þú segir ís, land, og Björk, þá vel, þú ert rétt, en þú þarft að auka fjölbreytni þig nánar með þetta Norðurlandanna!
Quick! Name three things from Iceland! If you said ice, land, and Bjork, then, well, you're right, but you need to diversify yourself more thoroughly with this Nordic country!
Ísland er eitt af mest heillandi löndum sem ég hef rekist á. Innskot frá því að vera óvart ekki alveg þakið ís, er það einn af the menningar framsækið löndum í heiminum, með hátt hlutfall af ánægju, LGBT jafnrétti og lífskjör. Það sem meira er, þetta litla land virðist vera alveg höfnina fyrir skapandi einstaklinga, ekki síst tónlistarmenn eins Of Monsters and Men, Sigur Rós, og, auðvitað, Bjork.
Iceland is one of the most fascinating countries I've come across. Aside from being surprising not completely covered with ice, it is one of the most cultural progressive countries in the world, with high rates of satisfaction, LGBT equality, and standards of living. What's more, this tiny country seems to be quite the harbor for creative individuals, most notably musicians like Of Monsters and Men, Sigur Rós, and, of course, Bjork.
En frá því seint á 20. öld, þar virtist vera bylgja í kvikmyndahús á Íslandi eins og fleiri og fleiri fólk byrjaði að átta sig á að "Hey, þessi staður er reyndar mjög sniðugt að leita ... við skulum setja það til góðra nota!" Með þessi, tveir hlutir gerast við Ísland og tengsl hennar við kvikmyndaiðnaðinum. Einn, helstu vinnustofur byrjaði landslagið meira og meira til notkunar í "sannfærandi" sögulegum kvikmyndum, og tveir, upprennandi kvikmyndagerðarmenn á Íslandi sá einnig möguleika á landslagi og nota það til þeirra kostur eins og heilbrigður.
But since the late 20th century, there seemed to be a surge in cinema Iceland as more and more people began to realize that "Hey, this place is actually really neat looking...let's put it to good use!"With that, two things happened with Iceland and its relation with the film industry. One, major studios began using the landscape more and more for use in "convincing" historical movies; and two, aspiring filmmakers within Iceland also saw the potential of the landscape and used it to their advantage as well.
Með allt sem kom íslensku bíómyndir sem ég indulged mig inn þremur sem ég valdi sérstaklega voru allir sigurvegarar á bestu mynd á Eddu verðlaunin, sem jafngildir Íslands Academy Awards. (sem er annar hlutur sem þú hefðir sennilega ekki hugmynd enn til, ásamt með, þú kvikmyndir frá stórfurðulegur Ísland) gegnum þetta allt, ég setti það á mig á því hvers vegna hver og einn á skilið þessa virtu (?) verðlaun, sem og uppeldi framvegis sameiginlegir milli þriggja.
With all that came the Icelandic movies that I indulged myself in. The three that I chose specifically were all winners of Best Picture at the Edda Awards, Iceland's equivalent of the Academy Awards. (which is another thing that you probably had no idea existed until now, along with, you movies from freaking Iceland) Through it all, I put it upon myself as to why each one deserves this prestigious(?) award, as well as bringing forth similarities between the three.
(Also, I'm going to take a break from the Icelandic language for the study. I need to give Google Translate a break.)
Movie #1: Mýrin (Jar City)
Basic Plot Rundown:
So the movie follows an investigator that gets involved with a murder case. Turns out that this involves a rape case that happened in the 1970s. Meanwhile, we follow the story of a man who seems to be just recovering from losing his daughter to some illness. Through the story of both men, we watch this mystery unfold, unveiling new twits and turns as the plot dives deep into the heart of crime, family, and loss.
Why did it win?
What I found most interesting about this movie was that it was directed very similarly to that of David Fincher's Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (albeit it was way, way, way less violent and disturbing). The director played with our sense of what was truly going on. Is tis guy telling the truth? Will this guy go ballistic and try to kill someone? Are watching the present or are we in a flashback? These questions are played around with ever so gracefully, and it was accented by the well-acted cast, the unsettling score, and the cinematography, a lot of which seemed to be emulated from Mr. Fincher, even though GWTT came out way later. All in all, the movie had a great mystery and it was very, very well made, almost better than the mystery thrillers that Hollywood pops out every year.
Movie #2: Eldfjall (Volcano)
Basic Plot Rundown:
An old man, former superintendent now fisherman, must come to terms with his cold demeanor and attempt to atone the relationship with with children. Amidst this, his wife suffers a terrible stroke, and he must take it upon himself to look after her well-being as well as his own.
Why did it win?
Did you cry at the end of Titanic? What about Old Yeller? Schindler's List? Well, those movies got nothin' on the emotional destructive power that this movie emits. I'm being completely serious when I say that this is LITERALLY THE MOST DEPRESSING AND SAD MOVIE THAT I HAVE WITNESSED IN MY YOUNG ADULT LIFE. I mean, MY GOD. It's a very rare occurrence in which I will use all caps, but this movie warrants it.
Let me break it down: The first 5 minutes shows footage from the 1974 volcanic eruption that is destroying a small town; 10 minutes later we see the old guy almost commit suicide; 10 minutes after that we see his boat break down in the water; and 20 minutes after that we see his wife have a stroke. It's like they gave this movie all of those awards in fear of being lashed out for having cold, dead souls.
Well, all jokes aside (kind of) the movie was very well acted and beautifully shot, along with a subtly effective use of somber music and editing.
Basic Plot Rundown:
The film centers around an Icelandic fisherman by the name of Gulli. He and his crew are out in the ocean when their ship capsizes. With no means of rescue, as well as the rest of the crew dead from the cold, Gulli swims to shore in the freezing water. The movie recounts his entire ordeal from swimming to shore, walking back to his home, and shocking the world with his incredible story of survival. All of this is based on the true events that happened to Guðlaugur Friðþórsson.
Why did it win?
Out of all of the Icelandic movies that I saw, this one was my favorite. Not only is it because I'm a stickler for survival stories, but this one especially had that raw feel to it, much like the feeling in successful survival movies like Cast Away and The Way Back. What stood out from this movie was the seemingly contemporary methods of artistic cinematography that this movie employed. I'm talking about long takes in the water, looming long shots over the ocean, and a capsizing boat, all of which I would not expect from a movie made in a country that some people forget has people in it. Like the movies before, it was very well acted with a gorgeous sense of direction, and this movie had the best sense of pace, sound, and spatial awareness for both editing and cinematography.
Connecting Themes
Before I finish this off, I feel as though it is important to point out some things that each of the movies dabbed in to in one way of another.
Cinematography
Like I said before, Iceland is a really neat place to film movies, and if you don't believe me Google it right now and choose you next wallpaper. Anyway, it's fortunate for the Icelandic directors to have literally instant access to the scenery, and because of this knowledge everyone of these directors used full advantage of it. Sweeping landscapes, extreme long shots, and attention to nature where all commonplace items within each movie.
The Ocean
There is a very strong symbolic sense of symbolism with the ocean and Iceland. Partly due to the country being an island but it was mainly something else. The ocean represented something "bigger" to the characters, both in the literal sense and metaphorical sense. With Jar City, it was the weight of solving a murder that can only be solved by looking into the past. With Volcano, it was the constant internal struggle for the old man to balance his self-worth and his care for his ailing wife. With The Deep, it was Gulli's fight for survival against the ocean and nature itself. All of these were each character's "ocean," an object so big that they could've easily been swept up into and never have gotten out.
The Volcano
This had more symbolism in Volcano than the rest (go figure), but it was at least mentioned in both movies. It is my knowledge that this specific eruption (Eldfell 1974) had a very profound impact on the Icelandic people that they feel the need to share their experiences of how it affected them, and that is was very much the case for these movies.
Sad Stuff
I mean, really. Every movie made me sad at one point, and one had me in tears. Really. Every one.
Final Thoughts
Svo hvað á ég að hugsa um Ísland og kvikmyndir hennar? Jæja, ég verð að segja að ég er notalegur undrandi! Ég hef alltaf að norrænir menningu voru mjög flott, sérstaklega með öllum víkingum og slíkt, en ég gerði ekki ráð fyrir svo rík menning sköpunargáfu. Með þjóð sem er einangrað á frigid Atlantshafi, ekkert á óvart þessi hvöt til að gera sem mest úr sjálfum sér og tjá er alveg ríkjandi.
So what do I think of Iceland and its movies? Well, I have to say I'm pleasantly surprised! I've always that Nordic cultures were really cool, especially with all of the vikings and such, but I did not expect such a rich culture of creativity. With a nation that's isolated in the frigid Atlantic, its no surprise that the urge to make the most of one's self and express creativity is quite prevalent.
Með þessi, ÉG gera virkilega hvetja þig til að fara út í langt nær heiminum (eða internetið) og upplifa íslensk bíómynd fyrir þig. Þú munt ekki sjá eftir því, og þú getur brag til vina þinna um það, líka! (Ég er ekki viss um hvað þú vilt fá, en þú veist, það er Ísland!)
With that, I really do encourage you to go out into the far reaches of the world (or the Internet) and experience an Icelandic movie for yourself. You won't regret it, and you can brag to your friends about it, too! (I'm not sure what you'd gain, but, you know, it's Iceland!)
Fond kveðjur,
~Grant Dunderman
December 2013
Film Studies Period 10
Monday, November 25, 2013
1975 - Coming soon... "Without Hesitation"
"You think you may know pain, you think you may know fear, but you've never experienced it like this with what the Los Angeles Times is calling, "the most intense and horrifying crime movie of the year..."
Warner Bros. presents... Without Hesitation.
Luke knew he had to shape up his life after coming home from prison. His wife and daughter gave him the encouragement and love to do so for the last 7 years.
But, tragedy strikes when a drunk driver mows the family down as they were driving home, killing his daughter, hospitalizing his wife, and putting him into a coma.
Luke awakens months later and hears of his daughter's death. Worse, the man who killed her, a low-life named Joshua, has just been released from probation. Angry, distraught, and in woe, Luke takes it upon himself to hunt down the man who took his daughter's life and make him experience the same pain...without hesitation
Critics across the country are raving over all of the actors.
The Chicago Tribune notes, "to say Jack Nicholson's performance as a man who wants to bring the same pain as he felt when he lost everything is terrifying is a total understatement."
The New York Times praises at "the complete and utter realism of Christopher Walken. You can actually feel his fear on screen."
Rolling Stones Magazine applauds the "hopelessness but subtleness of Luke's wife Mary, played by the magnificent Diane Keaton,"
and The Boston Globe says that "Max von Sydow's role as Cpt. Jude Harris is unparalleled to any of his other roles."
Warner Bros. presents, a film by the Academy Award winning director of The French Connection and The Exorcist William Friedkin...
Without Hesitation
Rated R.
Coming soon this fall..."
From the IMDb page:
Without Hesitation
R
Ratings: 8.8/10 from 1,023 users | Metascore: 84/100
Director: William Friedkin
Writer: Wiliam Friedkin
Cast:
Jack Nicholson - Luke Harding
Christopher Walken - Joshua
Diane Keaton - Mary Harding
Max von Sydow - Cpt. Jude Harris
Storyline: A man by the name of Luke returns home from prison after serving 7 years for counterfeiting money. Shortly after, he his hit by a drunk driver and is put under a coma. Shortly after waking up 3 months later, he finds to his dismay that his daughter died from the crash and his wife is horribly disfigured. Worse, the police captain, Cpt. Jude Harris, informs him that the drunk driver, a low life named Joshua, was just released from probation. Angry, distraught, and in woe, Luke goes on a homicidal rampage, hunting down the man who killed his daughter in a wild cat and mouse chase and killing anyone who stands in his way.
Genres: Thriller | Crime | Horror | Drama
Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)
Rated R for strong horror violence, suggestive themes, and strong and pervasive language.
Trivia
After the success of both The Exorcist and The French Connection, Director William Friedkin was granted full creative freedom from Warner Bros. for another movie. He decided to write and direct a movie that would "mixed my two previous film into something totally new and different," he said in a Rolling Stone interview.
Composer Jack Nitsche was called up by Friedkin to compose the score for Without Hesitation after the two worked together on The Exorcist. The composer reflects that he approached the score similarly to The Exorcist but wanted to add "percussive beats and more mid-range melodies to evoke the 'cat and mouse' feeling throughout the movie," he says in an interview for The Chicago Tribune.
Although many have cited this movie as a criticism of the judicial system and law enforcements, actor Jack Nicholson had stated that it was made more of a personal insight on the minds of psychopaths. "Imagine, like, you found a diary of a serial killer, and what if that explained everything?" He says in an interview with Johnny Carson. "What we were trying to show was that even the sickest and most demented people in our time still have motives, and whether or not those motives are justifiable was up to the audience to decide."
Goofs
An early draft of the poster misspelled the director's name to "William Friedrick." The posters that were printed did not ship to theaters, but some of the originals still exist and are rumored to sell up to $10,000.
Quotes
Luke: You want me to go through this again?
Joshua: No! Please! No!
Luke: Then say it.
Joshua: Please...please, don't do this to me, man...
Luke: Say it.
Joshua: It was an accident!
Luke: SAY IT! (stabs Joshua in the leg) Say you killed my daughter!
Joshua: (screaming in pain and sobbing) I KILLED YOUR DAUGHTER! I KILLED HER! PLEASE, FORGIVE ME!
Luke: Not yet.
Message Boards
21st century opinions - posted by: 70sfilmbuff
good for film studies? - posted by: HCdidomenico
BEST MOVIE EVAR - posted by: DunderThunder
scary? meh - posted by: dario
isn't this movie fake? - posted by: whatsgoingon
~Grant Dunderman
November 2013
Film Studies Period 10
From the IMDb page:
Without Hesitation
R
Ratings: 8.8/10 from 1,023 users | Metascore: 84/100
Director: William Friedkin
Writer: Wiliam Friedkin
Cast:
Jack Nicholson - Luke Harding
Christopher Walken - Joshua
Diane Keaton - Mary Harding
Max von Sydow - Cpt. Jude Harris
Storyline: A man by the name of Luke returns home from prison after serving 7 years for counterfeiting money. Shortly after, he his hit by a drunk driver and is put under a coma. Shortly after waking up 3 months later, he finds to his dismay that his daughter died from the crash and his wife is horribly disfigured. Worse, the police captain, Cpt. Jude Harris, informs him that the drunk driver, a low life named Joshua, was just released from probation. Angry, distraught, and in woe, Luke goes on a homicidal rampage, hunting down the man who killed his daughter in a wild cat and mouse chase and killing anyone who stands in his way.
Genres: Thriller | Crime | Horror | Drama
Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)
Rated R for strong horror violence, suggestive themes, and strong and pervasive language.
Trivia
After the success of both The Exorcist and The French Connection, Director William Friedkin was granted full creative freedom from Warner Bros. for another movie. He decided to write and direct a movie that would "mixed my two previous film into something totally new and different," he said in a Rolling Stone interview.
Composer Jack Nitsche was called up by Friedkin to compose the score for Without Hesitation after the two worked together on The Exorcist. The composer reflects that he approached the score similarly to The Exorcist but wanted to add "percussive beats and more mid-range melodies to evoke the 'cat and mouse' feeling throughout the movie," he says in an interview for The Chicago Tribune.
Although many have cited this movie as a criticism of the judicial system and law enforcements, actor Jack Nicholson had stated that it was made more of a personal insight on the minds of psychopaths. "Imagine, like, you found a diary of a serial killer, and what if that explained everything?" He says in an interview with Johnny Carson. "What we were trying to show was that even the sickest and most demented people in our time still have motives, and whether or not those motives are justifiable was up to the audience to decide."
Goofs
An early draft of the poster misspelled the director's name to "William Friedrick." The posters that were printed did not ship to theaters, but some of the originals still exist and are rumored to sell up to $10,000.
Quotes
Luke: You want me to go through this again?
Joshua: No! Please! No!
Luke: Then say it.
Joshua: Please...please, don't do this to me, man...
Luke: Say it.
Joshua: It was an accident!
Luke: SAY IT! (stabs Joshua in the leg) Say you killed my daughter!
Joshua: (screaming in pain and sobbing) I KILLED YOUR DAUGHTER! I KILLED HER! PLEASE, FORGIVE ME!
Luke: Not yet.
Message Boards
21st century opinions - posted by: 70sfilmbuff
good for film studies? - posted by: HCdidomenico
BEST MOVIE EVAR - posted by: DunderThunder
scary? meh - posted by: dario
isn't this movie fake? - posted by: whatsgoingon
~Grant Dunderman
November 2013
Film Studies Period 10
Sunday, November 17, 2013
MYST #4 – Beauty and the Beast
Ok, I'm gonna be honest here. I really like cartoons. I do! I like to watch 'em, draw 'em, and I even like to impersonate some cartoon voices, all of this being a product of a childhood rich with watching quality animated entertainment. That being said, I can confidently say that I can tell the good cartoons from, well, the crappy, kids' allowance sucking money making cartoons.
I am happy to say that Beauty and the Beast is not part of the latter. In fact, I am more happy to say that Beauty and the Beast is not only a good cartoon it is one of the best pieces of animation in the history of animated cinema.
Now, if you've never seen this movie, HA! Funny joke! Of course you've seen it, don't lie to your childhood! But seriously, if you haven't heard of it (for those of you who've lived off the land in Siberia for the last half-century) here's the rundown of the movie: a prince gets cursed by a enchantress, turning him into a beast and his castle residents into furniture and silverware; the curse is gauge by a rose, and if the last petal falls he is forever a beast and his living objects forever objects, and the only way to break the curse is to have someone love him; jump to the present, a girl by the name of Belle wants to get away from the boing life in her French town and from Gaston, a handsome brute who has a stalker-like affection towards Belle; low and behold, her father, who happens to be a crazy inventor, stumbles upon the Beast's castle and is swiftly imprisoned; Belle goes to rescue him, and in return for his release she becomes the Beast's prisoner; hi-jinks then ensue with the living objects, particularly with the candlestick and clock; and, eventually, the Beast and Belle grow fond of each other (I won't spoil the ending because, y'know, everyone here knows the ending).
Now, here's the real reason as to why I really wanted to watch this film (other than preparing myself for my upcoming auditions for our high school's production of the same show WISH ME LUCK). You see, rather than watching a movie for the first time, I went into watching this movie having seen it before. However, the last time I've seen this movie was, let's say, a decade ago, and my perception of this movie as a kid was very different as seeing it now as a young adult. Back then, my child-like wonder and imagination would have me completely absorbed in the magical worlds of these fantasy worlds, and depending on the movie there would be moments where I would remember specifically being very enchanted, scared, or utterly and completely happy. Re-watching movie like this now, I couldn't help but notice that those feelings were no longer present. But, rest assured, different feelings emerged. I felt a complete resolved feeling of appreciation for the animation, writing, and sense of captivation that Beauty and the Beast offered to me. It's hard for movies from my childhood to do that me, as the normal response would be feelings of nostalgia and nothing more. But the fact that this movie still holds up after nearly 20 years really means something not only for my inner child but also for my beliefs as an advent fan of quality cinema.
I give this movie:
10/10 for quality.
8.5/10 for watchability.
I hope you all enjoyed my review of Beauty and the Beast.
Fond regards,
~Grant Dunderman
November 2013
Film Studies Period 10
Thursday, October 24, 2013
MYST #3 – MST3K: Gamera
Ok! By a show of hands, who here has heard of Mystery Science Theater 3000? Anyone? No? Well my friend, you sure are missing out because after this MYST post you'll be watching hours upon hours of this wonderful production of comedy (As I have done without regret in the past)!
Basically, it's a show where three dudes commentate on a cheesy/bad old movies. Now, before I go in-depth about MST3K (that's how the cool kids say it), I'll go over the movie that they watched and reviewed which I subsequently watched and reviewed: Gamera!
...It's...it's basically turtle Godzilla.
No, really, that's all I can really say about the movie. It's a Japanese Kaiju film from 1965; you can't get any less or more specific than that. It like any disaster movie: scientist find some strange carvings of an ancient creature; the creature emerges and starts blowing s**t up; the world seems to be at it's end; the world leaders come together and find a way to defeat the monster; the monster is vanquished, but not necessarily killed; and there's some ridiculous subplot about someone saying that he/she "understands" the monster and that it is "alone" or "scared" or "hungry" or whatever cliched crap the writers will come up with.
That's the movie, ladies and gentlemen. This would be the end of the MYST post...had it not have been for these guys:
Like I said, if you don't know these guys you really should. They will make your boring hours of nothingness much more enjoyable.
To go further into it, MST3K was a show back in the late 80s and 90s that poked fun at bad movies using a sort of "peanut gallery" commentary (I know it's technically a show, but come on, they show the full movie for every one of them). It stars two robots, Tom Servo and Crow, along with their human friend Joel (it varies on which season).
Now, the reason why I say to go and watch these bad movies with these fellas is simple: they are like your best buds having a good with a terrible movie. They all have their individual charms, quirks, and personalities that just make you feel good inside. You get a comedy from movies that clearly weren't meant to be comedies, and you feel a sense of honest reward of sticking with it to end with these guys. You know the movie is bad, they know the movie is bad, and you all want to stay around and listen to all the funny remarks up until the credits roll.
I give this movie, on it's own:
2/10 for quality
3/10 for watchability
I give this movie, with the aide of the Mystery Science Theater 3000 crew:
8/10 for quality
10/10 for watchability
I hope you all enjoyed my review of Gamera with Mystery Science Theater 3000.
Fond regards,
~Grant Dunderman
October 2013
Film Studies Period 10
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
MYST #2 – Captain Phillips
It seems as though this summer wanted to give it's film-goers as many heart palpations in as many places as possible. We've got heart palpitations in space (Gravity), heart palpitations in the suburbs (Prisoners), and heart palpitations on a racetrack (Rush). But as intense movies go, there's always one that just stand out from the rest. The one that just gets right under your skin to make a grown man curl into the fetal position and cry "You fool! Don't do it!" The movie that gets the title of "Most Heart Palpitating Movie of the Summer, Like, No Joke, I literally Cried" goes to Paul Greengrass's Captain Phillips.
Now, Paul Greengrass movies have always been about motion and intensity (cough cough Bourne), whether it'd be translated into the writing or the shakey camera cinematography (if you thought the Bourne movies had the shakey camera thing down, try that on a boat and you will feel seasick). But this movie is different for two reasons: one, this is his first "based on a true story" movie (even though the real life Captain Phillips was much more douchey than in the movie); two, this is the first time in a Paul Greengrass movie where acting seemed to be the priority.
Now, say what you may about the Bourne movies and Matt Damon being incredible, that's fine. He was. But the Bourne movies' focus was more about the complex story and finding the true identity of Jason Bourne. For Captain Phillips, on the other hand, we know how it's going to end. It was a headlining news story. There was even a book written by the captain himself. We know he would live and that the bad guys bite the bullet (no pun intended).
But the beauty of this movie is that it's directed as though we don't know that. He wants us, the audience, the feel every tense minute in that movie as though we were on that ship being tracked down by the pirates, and the acting really solidifies this.
Tom Hanks is obviously taking the cake for this movie. His acting ability is unmatched in this role. It's not that fact that's he going all out all the time (cough cough Forest Gump), but it's more the subtleness of his fear and anxiety. It's obvious that he's trying to stay calm and trying to be one step ahead of the pirates, but if you look at his face you can just hear him crying out in his head "If you f**k this up, we're all going to die." That's impressive acting, when you can tell your whole situation just by your face.
But Tom Hanks isn't the only power-house actor. Let's take a look at the Somali pirates, and how I had to remind myself that they were not really Somali pirates. I'm being very serious in saying that they literally look, act, talk, walk, and even feel like they were from the coasts of the crime-ridden Somalia, which, when you look into it, is sort of true. The main pirate was born in Somalia, raised in Yemen, then moved to America. Talk about typecasting all you want, but this guy deserves an insane amount of praise for his role. He just may end up sharing an Oscar nod along with Hanks (which will happen. Don't lie to yourself, this movie was made to woo the Academy Awards).
I give this movie:
9.5/10 for quality (-0.5 for shaky camera)
10/10 for watchability (Only for the first viewing. You might want to collect your wits before braving it again.)
I hope you all enjoyed my review of Captain Phillips.
Fond regards,
~Grant Dunderman
October 2013
Film Studies Period 10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)